The heart of IERG's activities arranged into media-specific issues
A recap of IERG's accomplishments over the past year
IERG's most recent work product
List of Member Representatives and Companies
List of IERG Staff
List of Executive Committee
Quarterly Meeting Minutes
Useful links to environmental laws, regulations and environmental information resources on the web
Send an email to iergstaff@ierg.org
Enter your user name and password to gain access to the secure portion of the IERG web site
Please fill in the fields to receive information on joining IERG
Quarterly Meeting List of Documents


SUBJECT:    Impact of Boiler MACT Reconsideration in Illinois   

As reported at the January 18, 2012, IERG Quarterly Meeting, U.S. EPA issued its proposal to reconsider (revise) it’s original Boiler MACT rules, that were generally thought to be too stringent to be complied with, and had been stayed by U.S. EPA while it developed the revised rule.  Also reported was the fact that on January 9, 2012, a federal court vacated U.S. EPA’s stay, meaning that the original Boiler MACT rules are now in effect.  

View Memorandum

 


SUBJECT:      Update - 2008 Ozone NAAQS Designations   

On February 1, 2012, IERG filed the attached comments with U.S. EPA in its docket dedicated to the initial area designations under the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard.  As Members likely recall, U.S. EPA requested comments on its initial determination to designate 3 counties in Illinois (Madison, Monroe, and St. Claire) as nonattainment, and the remainder of the state as “unclassifiable/attainment.”  IERG’s comments support the initial determination, and make a number of arguments against U.S. EPA looking at 2011 data to make a determination that the Chicago area also be designated nonattainment.

  View Memorandum


Subject Environmental Groups Petition to have Illinois' Title V Permitting Authority Withdrawn    

In a petition dated January 30, 2012, a number of environmental groups petitioned U.S. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to make a determination (and issue a Notice of Deficiency) that Illinois is not administering the Title V permit program in accordance with the Clean Air Act, and, if the identified deficiencies are not corrected within 90 days, withdraw approval of the program and administer it federally.  The petition is largely premised on the fact that many of Illinois’ coal-fired power plants still do not have effective Title V permits (as they are stayed during their pending appeals before the Illinois Pollution Control Board).  In addition, the petition alleges deficiencies in Illinois’ regulations dealing with emissions during periods of malfunction, breakdown, and startup, as well as alleged underfunding of the permit program from a deficient fee structure. 

View Memorandum


SUBJECT:    IERG Conference Call to Discuss Beneficial Use Determinations for Coal Combustion Byproducts

The IERG conference call to discuss whether IERG should develop a regulatory proposal to govern the Illinois EPA’s making beneficial use determinations for the use of Coal Combustion Byproducts (CCB) will be at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 9, 2012.  With apologies to those who are unable to participate at that time, please don’t hesitate to contact IERG Staff to discuss the matter.

View Memorandum


SUBJECT:    IERG Proposal to Regulate Coal Combustion Byproduct Beneficial Use Determinations          

In light of the pending regulatory changes tightening Illinois’ groundwater quality standards, and the previously expressed frustration that IERG Members have with the Illinois EPA’s beneficial use determination process for coal combustion byproducts (“CCB”), IERG Staff has offered to explore the possibility of crafting and pursuing the adoption of a regulatory proposal to govern the beneficial use determination process.

View Memorandum


SUBJECT:  Environmental Fees Question and Answer

As the Members surely know, the General Assembly passed the Governor's huge fee increase bill this last legislative session in an effort to provide funding for the Agency and to fill the state's budget hole.  Since the Governor signed this bill, these fees are now law, and the Agency is in the process of implementing the increased and new fees.  With this implementation comes many questions.  IERG Staff will answer these questions as they arise, and will add them to our growing list of 'Environmental Fees:  Questions and Answers.

View Q & A

Part 620